|
European Workshop
Metals in the Environment
Incorporation of Metal Bioavailability into
Regulatory Frameworks
Der Workshop über die Einbeziehung der
Bioverfügbarkeit in die Regulation von Metallen in der Umwelt fand
am 1. und 2. April 2009 in Hamburg statt. Der Workshop wurde von der
TuTech Innovation GmbH organisiert, an der Technischen Universität
Hamburg (TUHH) veranstaltet und vom Umweltbundesamt unterstützt. 41
Experten aus Belgien, Frankreich, den Niederlanden, Schweden,
Großbritannien, USA und Deutschland besuchten die Veranstaltung.
Der Zweck des Workshops war es die wissenschaftlichen Entwicklungen
zur Bioverfügbarkeit von Metallen in der Umwelt und deren
Berücksichtigung in der Regulierung von Metallen wie z. B. durch die
REACH-Verordnung und die Wasserrahmenrichtlinie zu diskutieren.
Es wurden drei Hauptvorträge gehalten an deren Anschluss kurze
Statements von Teilnehmern des Workshops gemacht werden konnten. Die
Diskussion lief parallel in drei Arbeitsgruppen mit dem Fokus auf:
- Diskussion der Modelle und Konzepte
zur Bioverfügbarkeit
- Biologie zur Metallaufnahme und
-
regulatorische Aspekte.
Alle Dokumente, (Flyer, Kurzfassungen
der Hauptvorträge,
kurze Statements einiger Teilnehmer, Zusammenfassung des
Workshops) liegen in Englischer Sprache vor.
Kurzbeschreibung und Folien der Hauptvorträge des
Workshops/abstracts and presentations of the workshop
Ms. Wiebke Drost (UBA)
presented the concepts of the tiered approach taking metal
bioavailability into account. It was stated that bioavailability
is an important issue, because it would be an improvement for
the hazard assessment to know how much of the toxicant is taken
up from the different environmental phases. However, it is not
clear cut which of the abiotic and biotic parameters determine
the bioavailability. The guidance for metal risk assessment
under REACH suggests a tiered approach which was briefly
introduced. This concept considers the free ionic form of the
metals to be the most bioavailable form. Depending on whether a
risk has been identified or not, availability of
physico-chemical data and availability of a speciation model or
Biotic Ligand Model for the metal regarded an adequate
tier-level has to be selected . The free metal ion concentration
is considered the as the most relevant form for uptake. However
apart from geochemical conditions which control free metal
concentration, bioavailability is additionally a result of
contaminant/particle interaction and can be superimposed by
organisms' activity. Hence, the question arises whether this
tiered approach indeed reduces the uncertainty or do new
uncertainties emerge?
Mr. Wolfgang Ahlf (TUHH) presented the
need of knowing, in relation to metal bioavailability, the main
uptake routes of different organisms in aquatic systems. Generally,
it is considered that for most trace metals the free metal ions have
the highest bioavailability . Thus, the presence of the hydrophilic
complexing agent EDTA in water reduces the equilibrium concentration
of metal ions with a corresponding decrease in the metal uptake. In
the presentation data from experiments were shown which confirm this
assumption. However, aquatic systems are dynamic and there is
continuous interaction between solid phases (sediment, suspended
matter) and liquid phases (freshwater, pore water). Transfers of
metals between solid phases are regular processes, due to
non-equilibrium situations.
The biotic ligand model (BLM) approach has been proposed for use in
European Union (EU) risk assessments. The BLM provides a means to
predict ecotoxicological effect of metals in the environment, but at
present assumes that the most significant uptake is from the
dissolved phase. Asking for the relevant exposure pathways for
inorganic metals to organisms, the compartments water and sediment
have been evaluated and in addition the importance of contaminated
food. There is evidence in literature, that uptake occurs via the
dissolved phase, metal complexes, dietary and particle-bound metals.
It is apparent that dietary accumulation of metals is at least as
important as metal uptake from the aqueous phase and in many cases
dominates metal accumulation.
Mr. Joachim Heidemeier (UBA)
summarized the requirements and consequences of considering
bioavailability in the regulatory content. The Water Framework
Directive (2000/60/EU) sets out a comprehensive framework for
European water management. Aiming at reaching good ecological and
chemical status for the European water bodies a water management is
organized in river basin districts using a transparent approach with
a clear-cut timeframe. Regulations regarding pollution from chemical
substances refer to: priority substances and priority hazardous
substances (PS and PHS), set out in Annex X, which are of community
wide relevance and substances of regional concern, set out in Annex
VIII.
For the PS and PHS Environmental Quality Standards (EQS) have been
stipulated in Directive 2008/105/EU, for the substances of regional
concern EQS shall be developed by the member states using a
harmonized approach, also stipulated in the WFD.
One important step in the management cycle is the status
determination of so called “water bodies”, the smallest units
covered in the WFD. To that extent, the member states use three
comprehensive monitoring networks with different tasks, consisting
e.g. of approximately 7000 surface water monitoring stations in
Germany.
If the assessment of the water body does not show the status “good”,
the competent authorities must investigate the causes of the failure
and implement measures in order to reach the status “good”. As these
measures address the polluter for financing, the status
determination must be based on clear and litigable decisions.
When drafting regulations for this decision process, scientific
sophistication is one among several conflicting objectives e.g.
required monitoring efforts and costs, transparency of the decision
process or required time for results, which need to be balanced.
Kurzstatements der Teilnehmer/short-statements of participants

Erik Smolders
(Division Soil and Water Management)
Soil

Katrien Delbeke (European Copper Institute)
Environmental
Quality Standards derivation in the context of the Water Framework
Directive
Accounting for
Bioavailability of Metals: an Overview-Water

Ronny Blust
(Department of Biology, University of Antwerp)
The Dynamics of Metal Accumulation
and Toxicity Relationships (BIMBAM)

Christian Schlekat
(Nickel producers Environmental Research Association)
Experience of
Metals Risk Assessments in the Existing Substances Regulation
Process: Technical Committee for New and Existing Substances
discussions

Ed Tipping (Centre
for Ecology and Hydology, Lancaster Environment Center)
Metal toxicity to macroinvertebrates
in mine-affected streams, related to chemical speciation
Weitere Dokumente/further documents
|